Post by Alan Baker Post by Bigbird Post by Alan Baker Post by Bigbird Post by Alan Baker Post by Heron
2019 Canadian Grand Prix: Vettel Vs Hamilton
And More Jolyon Palmer Analysis
You mean the the video on the official F1 channel?
Did you expect it would disagree?
Completely and utterly irrelevant.
Considering the source...
A recent F1 driver.
On Formula1's official YouTube channel.
Post by Bigbird Post by Alan Baker
and the source's expected biases is not
I am not aware on his biases.
Even a complete moron might comprehend that that while that they might
think that makes the likely conclusion of the article predictable it
does not undermine it's integrity.
For instance you only quote articles that support your position; does
it follow that they should all be dismissed?
Post by Alan Baker Post by Bigbird Post by Alan Baker
relevant in determining the credibility of a source?
Any reason to suspect his credibility.
It's obvious to anyone of even average intelligence that Formula1's
official YouTube channel would not be hosting any video that
disagreed with the decision.
Well if you think it's obvious then you can assume a lot lower than
average I'm sure. :)
a) It's FOM not the FIA. It is not a given that they will
unquestionably support FIA decisions in all respects.
b) Even someone of ultra low intelligence, a moron say, would not
dismiss the article out of hand regardless of perceived bias or
motivation of the publisher especially if they do not have a very good
reason to question the credibility and integrity of the author.
Post by Alan Baker Post by Bigbird
You are making a great argument for ignoring all your comments though.
Trump fact check:
The grand total as of Sunday: 4,913 false claims
Last week’s total: 31 false claims
That’s the 75th-worst week of his presidency out of 116 weeks so far.