Post by Sir TimWish I thought you were right a425couple (or may I call you 425?) but I
fear that Nico has only to keep his head, drive sensibly (which he is good
at doing) and have reasonable luck to become WDC.
Unless the competition starts catching up and Merc don't have the car
advantage they have now. Not that I think Nico isn't quick (see below)
but right now all he has to do to get a podium is not screw up.
Post by Sir TimI have always thought Hamilton marginally the quicker of the two but his
pit stops have not been as good as Rosberg's, he himself has made mistakes
and, of course, he has had atrociously bad luck. I can't see that changing
any time soon.
It's hard to know how fast anybody in F1 is other than by comparison against
team mates. I recall that towards the end of Rosberg's first season with
Merc some journo said to Rosberg that he'd been fortunate that the real
Michael Schumacher hadn't shown up. Rosberg's reply: "Who says the real
Michael Schumacher didn't show up?" He believes in his own speed. And I think
you're right - he's not a lot slower than Hamilton. Which is to say that he's
pretty quick.
Ham's pit stops. I think this an area where the driver can make a difference.
Schumacher was very good at pit stops. The teams mark out the pit front and
the crew are pre-positioned against those marks. If you don't stop the car
exactly on the marks the crew have to make a shift and that costs time.
Schumacher was known for his accuracy in hitting the marks. Typically he
paid attention to that detail.
I don't say it happens every time, but I kept an eye on the Merc pit stops
that were shown at Hockenheim, and at least twice Hamilton overshot the
marks just a little. Just a little, but that little may mean the guys with
the wheels have to move slightly, the jack guys have to compensate and all
that adds up to a less than optimal pit stop.
Post by Sir Tim--
Henry Birkin, Bt.